As human beings, it’s difficult to contemplate what we would be
like without the millennia’s’ worth of memories that follow us. Lowis Lowry’s The
Giver explores what it would be like to live in a world that purged these
memories, in addition to sophisticated emotion, many rights, and even the
perception of color, and started over. The book is written from the point of
view of Jonas, an eleven year old existing in this dystopian society. When
Jonas turns twelve, he is assigned a vocation along with all the other children
his age. However, Jonas is placed in a unique profession, he is chosen at the
Ceremony of Twelve to inherit the position Receiver of Memories. This job means
Jonas will be given all the memories other citizens lost from the Giver, or
previous Receiver. As Jonas gains more memories, he learns to see through the
lies and into the twisted truth of his “happy” community. Jonas soon has to
question what is the right thing for a people to retain: liberty and knowledge
or happiness and ignorance?
The utopian society in which Jonas resides has
been altered to insure the contentedness of its citizens. “The life where nothing was ever unexpected. Or
inconvenient. Or unusual. The life without colour, pain or past.” No
one need worry about colors, pain, sorrow, or love. Deep feelings and vibrant,
impactful memories are extracted by either time or medication. The striping
away of collective memory not only takes away potentially painful experiences
from human history, but also prevents the people who live in this world from wishing
to engage in potentially harmful activities (hurtful relationships, etc) or
dwelling on nostalgia for the things they all gave up to live in this idealized
society. While to the modern American reader, one who has grown up being told
that freedom is the key to happiness, everyone in this world is content. “They were satisfied with their lives which had none
of the vibrance his (Jonas’) own was taking on.” Nobody living in this
community knows any different than the “sameness” that has existed their whole
lives. They’re happy without pain, happy without color, happy without knowing
beyond their own, sheltered bubbles. Jonas, once he starts to experience
these memories, is frustrated by the ignorant contentedness of his family and
everyone around him. “I feel sorry for anyone who is in a place where he feels
strange and stupid,” he says. This is, while understandable, a sentiment coming
from someone who was happy before painful memories thrust anguish upon him
Jonas could not have previously imagined. The pain of someone given these
memories is so intense that the previous receiver of memories asked to be
released, or killed, rather than endure the pain. “The Giver shook his head and
sighed. ‘No. And I didn't give her (the previous receiver) physical pain. But I
gave her loneliness. And I gave her loss. I transferred a memory of a child
taken from its parents. That was the first one. She appeared stunned at its
end.’’ While Jonas feels the need to give people pain and free will, he doesn’t
consider that they may be better off without the pain it causes. This difficult
grey area shows the constant moral and philosophical struggle throughout the
novel between understanding and peace.
While the citizens of this
utopian land are happy in their callowness and stupidity, the experiences Jonas
acquires as the Receiver of Memories convince him that they would be better off
with a greater depth, understanding, and quantity of pain in their day to day
lives. The abilities that allow Jonas to experience life on a deeper
level than the rest of his community prompt him to imagine a world where
everyone understood what he understood. “I liked the feeling of love,' [Jonas]
confessed. He glanced nervously at the speaker on the wall, reassuring himself
that no one was listening. ‘I wish we still had that,' he whispered.” Jonas
enjoys the pleasurable things he gets out of his position, such as affection
and the ability to see color. These are interesting capabilities; they bring
both a newfound metaphorical and literal color to life that he sees missing in
his life. At first, there seems to be no downside to filling the rest of
society with what Jonas has come to learn. However, Jonas soon learns that
there is more to memories than happiness and love. “He knew that there was no
quick comfort for emotions like those. They were deeper and they did not need
to be told. They were felt.” Jonas’s life had, until that point, been filled
with simple negative emotions, people were, on the surface, “sad” or “angry”, and these emotions
found their roots in problems that were easily fixed. However, as the Receiver
of Memories, he is faced with anguish and pain that cannot easily be remedied.
They were deep, backed by years and years of torment and experience in the
memories he was given. Was it worth giving up a content, albeit passive
existence for this pain? “Of course they needed to care. It was the meaning of
everything.” The meaning Jonas finds in these newfound emotions strengthens his
belief that they need to be shared. While sometimes excruciating, they are what
he believes bring a meaning and comprehension to the world that is necessary to
live at full capacity. This exemplifies the difficult choice Jonas has to make,
choosing agony and comprehension over blind contentedness.
Lois
Lowry’s novel expresses a common dilemma, whether it is right to sacrifice
depth for serenity. This question is the topic of many dystopian fantasies. We
find it interesting to imagine worlds in which our understanding of the world
shrinks because our analytical and emotional intelligence is so much of what
defines us as a species. While a dog may be able to think about how it will get
it’s next meal or experience superficial pleasure, humans are able to feel
things beyond ourselves and thusly be more connected to our environment,
others, and us as individuals. Loss of this ability would almost take away our
humanity, and so we wonder where we would be without it. Books that explore
fantasies like this one allow us to find importance in things we take for
granted, and that’s why they are so widely and deeply loved.
No comments:
Post a Comment